The last few posts and comments have sparked a good level of discussion on both sides of the Internet Tablets' future. I'd like to highlight some very good points made to contradict my
first critical post and
follow-up. Some of these are responses to the comments and some are from direct conversation with other Tablet users.
In the first post, I mentioned the importance of Hulu, NetFlix, and the BBC iPlayer. While these are fantastic developments in new media, very few users would actually require what is essentially a "mobile internet TV" in the purchase decision. Netflix in particular requires a DRM-heavy platform that is contrary to the ideals of the tablets. While it would be "cool" to have those features, they're not as important as I initially painted them.
In the second post, I mentioned that the hardware requirements are out of line with "reality" but are required. That may not be entirely true either as evidenced by the next realization:
Recently, Nokia's growing relationship with Facebook
has been discussed (link to wsj.com - subscription required) especially
in relation to Nokia's Ovi. This helped me to realize that the marketing of the N97 put the purpose (specifically - a social networking optimized mobile device) ahead of the features. What does that mean to consumers?
I've recently seen ads for the Apple iPhone, the Blackberry Storm, Samsung Omnia. They all have something in common: They claim to be the best choice for music, communication, mobile internet, and more. This is all too confusing for the consumer. If the Nokia N97 is marketed as "the perfect phone for social media" and then they tack on stuff like "Multimedia player, camera, keyboard, and a ton of other features" it will be far easier for consumers to picture themselves using it.
Why limit that approach to just the N97? Maemo tablets have a higher resolution display, better keyboard, and (currently) work independently of phones. With a software layer optimized for social networking, the Maemo tablet can potentially be the single greatest non-phone social networking device. Here are some features that could do it:
- Good camera (already promised at OSiM) for photo-video sharing.
- Lightweight photo editing for cropping and posting photos (software only)
- Improved GPS for geotagging and location-aware applications.
- Better CPU (already promised at OSiM) for a faster overall experience
- Social network applications or application layer to speed up status upates, location sharing, and photo/video sharing (software only)
Look at that. It's a device that people can actually see themselves using for a very popular task and it's no further from reality than what has already been promised.
Could the next Maemo tablet be "The Facebook Tablet?" Maybe.