aptly 2010.5.14.1-1
An interactive console-based apt and dpkg wrapper.
Section:
user/utilities
Repository:
Depends:
Size:
20438 bytes
MD5sum:
7ed7eae603bc00cd9ccd8c1db201e404
Source:
Status:
Package promoted
Bugtracker:
QA Quarantine ends:
ENDED 2010-05-28 07:15
Changes
| Tester | Karma | Timestamp |
| Mustali Dalal (Tester) (996) | 2010-09-10 11:25 UTC | |
| Attila Csipa (Tester) (1430) | 2010-09-09 16:17 UTC | |
| Harald Schmitt (Tester) (785) | 2010-09-09 14:55 UTC | |
| Nikita Nalyutin (46) | 2010-05-30 20:22 UTC |
Package events
| Event type | User | Timestamp |
| Package promoted | Edwin Marshall | 2010-09-19 17:32 UTC |
| Promotion unlocked | System | 2010-09-10 11:26 UTC |
| Package is in testing | System | 2010-05-18 07:15 UTC |

Comments:
Harald, that script is wrong. All of those locations except for /usr/bin/aptly are symlinked. Run 'du -h' to see what I mean
find_non_opt_files.pl /var/lib/dpkg/info/aptly.md5sums The script is here: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=433336#post43336 output: aptly : 4.00K /usr/bin/aptly aptly : 4.00K /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/CHANGES aptly : 36.00K /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/COPYING aptly : 8.00K /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/aptly.py aptly : total non-opt usage: 52.00K
Uh, didn't realize there was an alternate syntax for these pages, sorry about the annoying formatting.
Harald, how did you get those numbers?
I ran a few quick commands and come up with 12kb not optified, which are the executable script, the system config, and the sudoers file:
find out what files are installed by aptly
dpkg -L Aptly /. /etc /etc/sudoers.d /etc/sudoers.d/aptly.sudoers /etc/aptly /etc/aptly/system.cfg /usr /usr/lib /usr/lib/python2.5 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/utils.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/COPYING /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/config.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/aptly.py /usr/bin /usr/bin/aptly /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/aptly /usr/share/doc/aptly/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/aptly/copyright /usr/share/doc/aptly/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/lib/python resides in opt
df -h | grep /usr/lib/python2.5 /opt/pymaemo/usr/lib/python2.5 2.0G 263.9M 1.6G 14% /usr/lib/python2.5
documents are purged
cat /usr/share/doc/* Purged by docpurge
only files in root reside in /etc and /usr/bin
du -ch /etc// | grep aptly && du -ch /usr/bin/* | grep aptly 4.0k /etc/aptly/system.cfg 4.0k /etc/sudoers.d/aptly.sudoers 4.0k /usr/bin/aptly
There are 52Kb not optified. Works for me. I did an "update" and then "install mnemosyne" and mnemosyne installed fine.
Agreed. In fact, you will notice firstly, that he version you are using is NOT in testing, and secondly that the newest version IS in devel and has not been promoted.
The only version that I ever promoted was 2010.5.14, which doesn't have the bugs you mention.
Please test the version in devel and pm me if you have the same errors, thanks.
Errrm.. still having problems :)
Nokia-N900:~# aptly Aptly 2010.5.15 Type 'help' for more information or 'quit' to exit. Exception in thread Thread-1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/threading.py", line 486, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/threading.py", line 663, in run
self.function(self.args, *self.kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/aptly.py", line 42, in get_catalogues
self.catalogues = Catalogues()
File "/home/user/projects/aptly/src/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/utils.py", line 16, in init
self.fillCatalogues()
File "/home/user/projects/aptly/src/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/utils.py", line 39, in fillCatalogues
alias = catalogue.find('name').text
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'text'
install
What package(s) would you like to install? ===> gnurobbo Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Couldn't find package None *** Unknown syntax: EOF
However, the main point is that (regardless of the fixes involved for which I'm grateful) I don't think this is extras-testing material. It's welcome in extras-devel, but I would suggest thumbing it down so it does not clog the QA queue (at least until it regains functionality).
I lied. Fixed it a few moments ago, upgrade to 2010.8.16.0 and you should be ok.
BTW, version 2010.5.14 works as expected if you want to downgrade in the meantime.
Nothing Attila, it's a bug. I stopped working on aptly for lack of interest, but I'll look into it Wednesday and see if I can fix this for you.
Hmmm... What am I doing wrong ?
Nokia-N900:~# aptly Aptly 2010.5.15 Type 'help' for more information or 'quit' to exit. install
What package(s) would you like to install?
===> simplecal
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/aptly.py", line 249, in
Aptly().cmdloop()
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/cmd.py", line 141, in cmdloop
line = self.precmd(line)
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/aptly.py", line 65, in precmd
self.onecmd(command)
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/cmd.py", line 219, in onecmd
return func(arg)
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/aptly.py", line 118, in do_install
self.do_install(packages)
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/aptly.py", line 110, in do_install
Popen(' '.join(['apt-get', 'install'] + config.main['options'] + remote),
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/aptly/config.py", line 53, in getitem
for value in dict.getitem(self, key).split(',')]
Comments:
You must be logged in to make comments.