FYI : ConnMan deconstructed : http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2009/06/25/networkmanager-and-connman/
FYI : ConnMan deconstructed : http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2009/06/25/networkmanager-and-connman/
Re: FYI : ConnMan deconstructed : http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2009/06/25/networkmanager-and-connman/
2009-07-03 10:18 UTC
HI,
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM, David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com> wrote:
> I thought this would be of interest to the list.
>
> Also some good comments here: http://lwn.net/Articles/338715/
well, I don't like very much the NIH syndrome, but this time I've to agree
with the decision of writing everything from scratch. NM is a huge pill of
'mixed-code' with a lot of dependences on the UI, it works fairly well in my
gnome desktop right now, but the KDE/mobile users usually have a lot of
problem with NM.
To be fair, the network manager app that gave me the best user experience in
a linux box so far, was the proprietary app in your tablets (insert your
rants here :P).
Best regards,
--
Valério Valério
http://www.valeriovalerio.org
>
>
> David
>
> --
> "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."
>
>
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM, David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com> wrote:
> I thought this would be of interest to the list.
>
> Also some good comments here: http://lwn.net/Articles/338715/
well, I don't like very much the NIH syndrome, but this time I've to agree
with the decision of writing everything from scratch. NM is a huge pill of
'mixed-code' with a lot of dependences on the UI, it works fairly well in my
gnome desktop right now, but the KDE/mobile users usually have a lot of
problem with NM.
To be fair, the network manager app that gave me the best user experience in
a linux box so far, was the proprietary app in your tablets (insert your
rants here :P).
Best regards,
--
Valério Valério
http://www.valeriovalerio.org
>
>
> David
>
> --
> "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."
>
>
Re: FYI : ConnMan deconstructed : http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2009/06/25/networkmanager-and-connman/
2009-07-03 10:27 UTC
Agreed. I hate NetworkManager so badly. I had nothing but trouble with
it on a tablet (Mer) and on a desktop computer. I had to pin the
NetworkManager from Ubuntu Hardy when I upgraded as the newest version
gave me nothing but trouble.
icd2, the Network Manager used in Diablo, is probably the most
reliable manager I've used.
I find it hard to agree with the article due to my own experiences and
it is heavily biased.
More power to ConnMan!
Best Regards,
Faheem
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Valerio Valerio<vdv100@gmail.com> wrote:
> HI,
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM, David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com> wrote:
>>
>> I thought this would be of interest to the list.
>>
>> Also some good comments here: http://lwn.net/Articles/338715/
>
> well, I don't like very much the NIH syndrome, but this time I've to agree
> with the decision of writing everything from scratch. NM is a huge pill of
> 'mixed-code' with a lot of dependences on the UI, it works fairly well in my
> gnome desktop right now, but the KDE/mobile users usually have a lot of
> problem with NM.
> To be fair, the network manager app that gave me the best user experience in
> a linux box so far, was the proprietary app in your tablets (insert your
> rants here :P).
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Valério Valério
>
> http://www.valeriovalerio.org
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>> --
>> "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
it on a tablet (Mer) and on a desktop computer. I had to pin the
NetworkManager from Ubuntu Hardy when I upgraded as the newest version
gave me nothing but trouble.
icd2, the Network Manager used in Diablo, is probably the most
reliable manager I've used.
I find it hard to agree with the article due to my own experiences and
it is heavily biased.
More power to ConnMan!
Best Regards,
Faheem
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Valerio Valerio<vdv100@gmail.com> wrote:
> HI,
>
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:00 AM, David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com> wrote:
>>
>> I thought this would be of interest to the list.
>>
>> Also some good comments here: http://lwn.net/Articles/338715/
>
> well, I don't like very much the NIH syndrome, but this time I've to agree
> with the decision of writing everything from scratch. NM is a huge pill of
> 'mixed-code' with a lot of dependences on the UI, it works fairly well in my
> gnome desktop right now, but the KDE/mobile users usually have a lot of
> problem with NM.
> To be fair, the network manager app that gave me the best user experience in
> a linux box so far, was the proprietary app in your tablets (insert your
> rants here :P).
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Valério Valério
>
> http://www.valeriovalerio.org
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>> --
>> "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Also some good comments here: http://lwn.net/Articles/338715/
David
--
"Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."